0xDECAFBAD

It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.

OPML vs OML - Fork but don't fight!

In my intermittent online presence, I've been happily watching Dave Winer's ramp-up with OPML toward OSCON with things like "How to implement an OPML directory browser". I love outliners, and though it's been a little while since I played with Radio, I loved Instant Outlining and the transclusion of outside outlines into the one at hand via URL. And when Dave first introduced the idea of an OPML-based distributed web directory, I figured it was the start of another nifty twist in the web fabric. (You know, the kind that makes wrinkles? The kind of wrinkles that make brains smarter?)



Anyway, even given all this, OPML has always bugged me, and I'm not alone. In fact, today I found a link to OML, the Outline Markup Language project on ?SourceForge, which seems to seek to address many of the same things that have bugged me. That is, things like UserLand application-specific tags, and extension via arbitrary attributes. Though I'm no master of deep XML magic, these things struck me as grungy.



But you know, we're designing for recombinant growth with the lazyweb here (or at least, Dave Winer was and is), and OPML looks like one of those dirty things that got thrown together quickly in order to enable a laundry list of further projects. It works, isn't all that hard to grasp, and has gotten adopted quickly. There's momentum there. As Dave says, there is no wait for tools.



So, now there's also OML starting. Hopefully this won't become another rehash of the RSS fight.
Because, I sense many similar issues between the two. Maybe it would have been better still if OML had been named something completely avoiding the letters O, P, M, or L. I already see mailing list charters being called out in order to quiet unwanted discussion of fundamentals, but, hopefully we can avoid anyone claiming that they have the One True Format, all fighting for the same name and slapping each other around with version numbers. Gah.



Anyway. I like OML but see some grunge in it as well. At the moment, I'm using an OPML-supporting tool. I can't imagine that conversion would be more than an XSLT file away. Well, maybe more than that. Beyond that, let's agree to disagree and viva le fork. Let the best, most demonstratably capable format win. Meanwhile, I'm still considering that Tinderbox license to see if I might like multi-dimensional outlining...

shortname=opml_vs_oml

Archived Comments

  • Aaron of Montreal
    Ha ha! Don't forget otlml ;-) Why on Earth do people who write outline DTDs (me included) not bake support for XInclude into the spec?
  • Danny Ayers
    I pretty much agree on all points, though I come down solidly in favour of a replacement for OPML. The format is currently like a prototype, one that you would ditch once you'd played with for a day or two. If OML works (i.e. folks like yourself point out the grunge) then hopefully we can have a non-proprietry, *validatable* replacement for OPML that can evolve. The OPML list is a joke, Dave moderates out any criticism, while happily promoting dodgy usage on his site (let's all make 404s!). There is a fundamental problem with his 'look at the canopy, not the roots' approach - without roots, before long the tree falls over. btw, re. multidimensional outlining - tell me what you want! (for Ideagraph)
  • Ray Grieselhuber
    As the specification originator, I'm glad to see it getting some attention. What we need is exactly the kind of comments that you are making in order to improve the specification. If you are a big user of outliners, join the list and tell us what you want. By the way, XInclude is a great idea. We shall have to take a look at it. We are not looking for a fight, just a reasonable specification that is not controlled by one person. Our use of the name OML was admittedly useful from an evangelistic standpoint on one hand, and on the other hand, simply a good name. What else are we going to call it? ;-)
  • Bill Kearney
    I know! Call it OPML-2.0! (ducks and runs...)
  • Ray Grieselhuber
    Ha! That would go over really well!
  • l.m.orchard
    aaron: Ack! I did have a nagging notion that I'd forgotten another outliner XML format out there. And yours was it!
  • l.m.orchard
    /me joins the OML mailing list. Here's to scouring out the grunge!