Portfolio Editor Taken To Point Of Ecstasy By Boss [From The Mailbag]
    2008-03-25 - 00:57:58

    Picture 7-8An online staffer has written in with a fairly lengthy account of the continuing discontent inside Condé Nast business magazine Portfolio. The anonymous tipster said that "every last person at the magazine" except new managing editor Jacob Lewis is lined up against editor Joanna Lipman, deputy editor Amy Stevens and senior editor Kyle Pope. (And the ungrateful hacks wonder why they are being pushed out the door!) But the anger may only be strengthening Lipman's position. Condé Nast patriarch Si Newhouse has a big fan in Lipman, who recently told staff her initial meeting with the Advance Publications CEO left her "so happy she could have been hit by a truck." Now Newhouse is said to have embattled Lipman's back. Email from the Portfolio.com insider after the jump.

    Morale has always been low here, but it's never been
    lower, and the downcline (to quote our Treasury
    secretary) is steepening.

    The only reason there's been no mass exodus is because
    the pay is good, nobody else is hiring, and the
    economy is at the abyss.

    Many magazines develop into factions. At Portfolio,
    the factions are quite lopsided. It's every last
    person at the magazine versus Joanne Lipman, Amy
    Stevens, and Kyle Pope. (With new managing editor
    Jacob Lewis, who came over from The New Yorker,
    bewildered and privately neutral, but loyal to Joanne
    because that's his job.)

    There's nothing new about Joanne's infuriations.
    What's troublesome is that Conde Nast allows them go
    on and on and on. The only thing predictable about
    Joanne Lipman is that nobody has a frigging clue what
    she wants. She orders up one thing and condemns the
    editors for delivering it. She can't explain her story
    judgment, and no one knows whether that's because she
    has none, or because her mind is so internally
    confused that even she doesn't know what she is
    thinking from day to day or hour to hour.

    Worst of all: outside of finance and advertising, she
    knows squat about business, and maybe finance and
    advertising too. The result is a mess of a magazine.
    What's it supposed to be? If the readers don't know,
    and the advertisers don't know, it's because the staff
    doesn't know, and if Joanne knows she's not doing a
    very good job of explaining it.

    It's all too bad because Portfolio could have been so
    good. "The Vanity Fair of business magazines" is an
    idea that sounded great to most of us who joined up
    here. But the opportunity is being pissed away.

    Joanne gave a speech a week or so ago in which she
    revealed that after she left her first meeting with Si
    Newhouse, before she was hired, she was so happy she
    could have been hit by a truck. This was interpreted
    here as a plea to Si not to throw her in front of that
    truck now. (Her kids must have been pleased to hear
    that she regards a lunch with Si as the highlight of
    her life.)

    People tell me that calls for Joanne's head will
    ensure her continued tenure, because Si will dig in
    his heels.

    But Si, you're a smart business person. She's wrecking
    your magazine. Talk to the staff, they'll tell you.
    You need to do something about it, before it's too
    late for everybody.