<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: date-based pagination</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination</link>
	<description>It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anil</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination/comment-page-1#comment-362899</link>
		<dc:creator>Anil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Jul 2008 17:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination#comment-362899</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Actually, yeah, we built the default pagination for archives in MT4 to be category-by-month, for exactly this reason. I regularly see &quot;?page=2&quot; in URLs and it just seems like such an obvious, avoidable mistake for so many to have embraced. SEO aside, permalinks that are destined to expire over time seem pretty reader-hostile, too.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, yeah, we built the default pagination for archives in MT4 to be category-by-month, for exactly this reason. I regularly see &#8220;?page=2&#8243; in URLs and it just seems like such an obvious, avoidable mistake for so many to have embraced. SEO aside, permalinks that are destined to expire over time seem pretty reader-hostile, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil Kandalgaonkar</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination/comment-page-1#comment-361945</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil Kandalgaonkar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Jul 2008 19:44:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination#comment-361945</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;ve had the same idea for Upcoming, for obvious reasons... our SRP pagination would then be permalinks.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve had the same idea for Upcoming, for obvious reasons&#8230; our SRP pagination would then be permalinks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fluffy</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination/comment-page-1#comment-361777</link>
		<dc:creator>fluffy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2008 20:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/2008/07/17/date-based-pagination#comment-361777</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;You mean, like the date-based archives that Movable Type has had for ages?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yeah, I like those.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You mean, like the date-based archives that Movable Type has had for ages?</p>
<p>Yeah, I like those.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
