Comments on: Say hello to FeedMagick2 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2 It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee. Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha By: megalar http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-222625 megalar Sun, 05 Aug 2007 12:25:34 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-222625 <p>Yesterday my host upgraded to php5 so I ran over to your svn dump and installed feedmagick2. After editing the $baseurl and rewritebase i tested it and it worked like a charm, so I took a nap. Upon waking I was gonna go play with it and see what hacks I could get going with it but something was fubar. Warning: fopen(/home/megalar/www/html/feedmagick/logs/feedmagick2-debug-20070805.log) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /usr/share/php/Log/file.php on line 216 are the errors I get as you can see @ <a href="http://xiled.rss-central.net/feedmagick/" rel="nofollow">my site</a>. If it hadn't worked to begin with I would think module problems on my server. To my knowledge, and my host's knowledge, nothing has changed since the upgrade so I'm wondering if it is some sort of bug or a server problem that waited a few hours to reveal itself. The latter doesn't really make much sense to me but I can't rule it out since I'm not r00t on the box and am not 100% certain my host didn't bork something while I slept. </p> <pre><code> anyhoo, your thoughts? </code></pre> Yesterday my host upgraded to php5 so I ran over to your svn dump and installed feedmagick2.
After editing the $baseurl and rewritebase i tested it and it worked like a charm, so I took a nap.
Upon waking I was gonna go play with it and see what hacks I could get going with it but something
was fubar.
Warning: fopen(/home/megalar/www/html/feedmagick/logs/feedmagick2-debug-20070805.log) [function.fopen]: failed to open stream: Permission denied in /usr/share/php/Log/file.php on line 216
are the errors I get as you can see @ my site.
If it hadn’t worked to begin with I would think module problems on my server. To my knowledge, and my host’s knowledge, nothing has changed since the upgrade so I’m wondering if it is some sort of bug or a server problem that waited a few hours to reveal itself. The latter doesn’t really make much sense to me
but I can’t rule it out since I’m not r00t on the box and am not 100% certain my host didn’t bork something while I slept. 

              anyhoo, your thoughts?
]]> By: l.m.orchard http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143985 l.m.orchard Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:58:49 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143985 <p>@jm3: Ah! Good catch. I really need to eventually installer-ify that kind of stuff.</p> @jm3: Ah! Good catch. I really need to eventually installer-ify that kind of stuff.

]]> By: John Manoogian III http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143981 John Manoogian III Mon, 30 Apr 2007 17:53:08 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143981 <p>addendum to README:</p> <p>Installation</p> <p>cp conf/config.php-dist conf/config.php chmod a+w logs - RewriteBase /~lorchard/FeedMagick2 + RewriteBase /FeedMagick2</p> addendum to README:

Installation

cp conf/config.php-dist conf/config.php
chmod a+w logs
- RewriteBase /~lorchard/FeedMagick2
+ RewriteBase /FeedMagick2

]]> By: kellan http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143941 kellan Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:02:31 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143941 <blockquote>For one, I’m refusing to play with anything older than PHP 5.</blockquote> <p>That must be nice. </p> <p>And curse you, this looks interesting, now I've got to find time to look at it.</p>

For one, I’m refusing to play with anything older than PHP 5.

That must be nice.

And curse you, this looks interesting, now I’ve got to find time to look at it.

]]> By: l.m.orchard http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143913 l.m.orchard Mon, 30 Apr 2007 14:43:54 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143913 <p>@jamesv: Take a look at the source to this big-ish pipeline, all the way at the end:</p> <p>http://decafbad.com/2007/04/FeedMagick2/pipelines/masterfeed</p> <p>You can basically slap a Cacher module at the tail-end or even middle of a long string of modules, and it'll cache the results of everything before it. I've got a cache lifetime set in the conf/config.php, and you can also set the lifetime in the Cacher parameters. There can multiple Cacher's per pipeline too.</p> <p>This thing might not quite yet be even as stable / in working order as the original FeedMagick, but it might be worth poking at for you. :)</p> @jamesv: Take a look at the source to this big-ish pipeline, all the way at the end:

http://decafbad.com/2007/04/FeedMagick2/pipelines/masterfeed

You can basically slap a Cacher module at the tail-end or even middle of a long string of modules, and it’ll cache the results of everything before it. I’ve got a cache lifetime set in the conf/config.php, and you can also set the lifetime in the Cacher parameters. There can multiple Cacher’s per pipeline too.

This thing might not quite yet be even as stable / in working order as the original FeedMagick, but it might be worth poking at for you. :)

]]> By: dRAUPP http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143891 dRAUPP Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:40:16 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143891 <p>hawt.</p> hawt.

]]> By: jamesv http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2/comment-page-1#comment-143811 jamesv Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:39:15 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/2007/04/29/say-hello-to-feedmagick2#comment-143811 <p>Aw man, now I've got to port all the code you wrote while you were here over to this new hotness ;) I really like (and appreciate) the single script approach.</p> <p>Is caching at a module level done automatically, or is that something I need to flag in my original call? Some installs of the original code base are now aggregating large sections of a pool of around 400 feeds, and eeking out even minor performances gains would be just lovely.</p> Aw man, now I’ve got to port all the code you wrote while you were here over to this new hotness ;) I really like (and appreciate) the single script approach.

Is caching at a module level done automatically, or is that something I need to flag in my original call? Some installs of the original code base are now aggregating large sections of a pool of around 400 feeds, and eeking out even minor performances gains would be just lovely.

]]>