<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Do gophers make good stuffing?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing</link>
	<description>It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing/comment-page-1#comment-2822</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Nov 2005 18:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=777#comment-2822</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Bill, maybe for tools Les is referring to every single (X)HTML editor ;-)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmm, that Dave has those tools to build on must be useful, but I&#039;m sure there are equivalents in the rest of the open source world. But it is interesting that Dave has this stack of (moderately) his own making: XML/RPC, OPML, RSS 2.0, Frontier/Manilla and whatever its scripting language is called. So in a way every one of his new developments is an addition to his &lt;em&gt;own&lt;/em&gt; world, before it&#039;s an addition to the world at large. I could imagine that being pretty motivational.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dunno, or maybe it&#039;s simply the time and enthusiasm bit that makes the difference. Like Les I&#039;ve got plenty in my in-tray already, and when I&#039;ve got time of my own making a decent standards-based outliner is low on the list, even though it&#039;d be very nice to have.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bill, maybe for tools Les is referring to every single (X)HTML editor ;-)</p>
<p>Hmm, that Dave has those tools to build on must be useful, but I&#8217;m sure there are equivalents in the rest of the open source world. But it is interesting that Dave has this stack of (moderately) his own making: XML/RPC, OPML, RSS 2.0, Frontier/Manilla and whatever its scripting language is called. So in a way every one of his new developments is an addition to his <em>own</em> world, before it&#8217;s an addition to the world at large. I could imagine that being pretty motivational.</p>
<p>Dunno, or maybe it&#8217;s simply the time and enthusiasm bit that makes the difference. Like Les I&#8217;ve got plenty in my in-tray already, and when I&#8217;ve got time of my own making a decent standards-based outliner is low on the list, even though it&#8217;d be very nice to have.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bill Seitz</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing/comment-page-1#comment-2819</link>
		<dc:creator>Bill Seitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 16:33:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=777#comment-2819</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I&#039;m not sure I agree about there be more tools for XOXO, esp if you focus on finished packages usable by non-techies.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dave, having provided a good-quality weblog authoring tool and aggregator on the same integrated platform, is in a position to leverage new ideas more easily than everyone making their own little custom tools that never get integrated easily into WordPress or Bloglines.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Or am I missing something?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure I agree about there be more tools for XOXO, esp if you focus on finished packages usable by non-techies.</p>
<p>Dave, having provided a good-quality weblog authoring tool and aggregator on the same integrated platform, is in a position to leverage new ideas more easily than everyone making their own little custom tools that never get integrated easily into WordPress or Bloglines.</p>
<p>Or am I missing something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing/comment-page-1#comment-2816</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:58:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=777#comment-2816</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Oh yeah!  I forgot about Google Sets.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh yeah!  I forgot about Google Sets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: skippy</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/11/24/do-gophers-make-good-stuffing/comment-page-1#comment-2815</link>
		<dc:creator>skippy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Nov 2005 02:52:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=777#comment-2815</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Isn&#039;t &lt;a href=&quot;http://labs.google.com/sets&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Google Sets&lt;/a&gt; already a working example of Google harvesting &lt;ul&gt; and &lt;ol&gt; tags from the general HTML?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t <a href="http://labs.google.com/sets" rel="nofollow">Google Sets</a> already a working example of Google harvesting &lt;ul&gt; and &lt;ol&gt; tags from the general HTML?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
