<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: It&#8217;s back to OmniWeb for me!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me</link>
	<description>It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Keys</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2710</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Keys</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 20:25:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2710</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;See, I switched from OW to FF for the reason you&#039;re going the other way.  I found that OmniWeb was a total bogart on my memory.  After I switched to FireFox, that seemed to go away.  I think that FF may use more memory over time though; not quite a leak, but it doesn&#039;t seem to let go of memory as tabs are closed.  I&#039;ll give your technique a try tonight I guess.  I just wish FF would use the blasted Keychain so I don&#039;t have to switch back and forth remembering passwords.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>See, I switched from OW to FF for the reason you&#8217;re going the other way.  I found that OmniWeb was a total bogart on my memory.  After I switched to FireFox, that seemed to go away.  I think that FF may use more memory over time though; not quite a leak, but it doesn&#8217;t seem to let go of memory as tabs are closed.  I&#8217;ll give your technique a try tonight I guess.  I just wish FF would use the blasted Keychain so I don&#8217;t have to switch back and forth remembering passwords.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saltation</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2706</link>
		<dc:creator>Saltation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:11:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2706</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;now, that&#039;s some weird interaction b/w html italics and markdown preprocessing...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>now, that&#8217;s some weird interaction b/w html italics and markdown preprocessing&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Saltation</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2705</link>
		<dc:creator>Saltation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 01:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2705</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;browser+ OS will chew about half your ram, plut panther/tiger&#039;s bizarre swap setup forces unnecessary paging.
try modifying your /etc/rc such that the default&lt;em&gt;pager line looks like:
&lt;i&gt; dynamic&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/em&gt;pager  -S 20000000  -H 10000000  -L 30000000  -F ${swapdir}/swapfile&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>browser+ OS will chew about half your ram, plut panther/tiger&#8217;s bizarre swap setup forces unnecessary paging.<br />
try modifying your /etc/rc such that the default<em>pager line looks like:<br />
<i> dynamic</i></em>pager  -S 20000000  -H 10000000  -L 30000000  -F ${swapdir}/swapfile</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2691</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 18:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2691</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Scott: Well, I have used Camino off and on.  But, for me, the Firefox UI and extensions are kinda the whole point of using it.  (ie. Greasemonkey and XUL extensions)  I&#039;m not particularly wedded to the Gecko rendering engine, other than being very happy it&#039;s around and does the right thing mostly.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Scott: Well, I have used Camino off and on.  But, for me, the Firefox UI and extensions are kinda the whole point of using it.  (ie. Greasemonkey and XUL extensions)  I&#8217;m not particularly wedded to the Gecko rendering engine, other than being very happy it&#8217;s around and does the right thing mostly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aristotle Pagaltzis</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2690</link>
		<dc:creator>Aristotle Pagaltzis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 07:07:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2690</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Any Gecko-based browser will be heavy on CPU... I remember when I had my 450MHz PII with 256MB and running Mozilla was an excercise in patience. I took my current 1.533Gz Athlon with 512MB setup for it to feel smooth.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Any Gecko-based browser will be heavy on CPU&#8230; I remember when I had my 450MHz PII with 256MB and running Mozilla was an excercise in patience. I took my current 1.533Gz Athlon with 512MB setup for it to feel smooth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2685</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2005 02:02:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2685</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you tried Camino? Most of the sluggishness I&#039;ve heard reported by Firefox users seems to be tied to the UI? Camino re-wrote the UI using Cocoa.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you tried Camino? Most of the sluggishness I&#8217;ve heard reported by Firefox users seems to be tied to the UI? Camino re-wrote the UI using Cocoa.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2684</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 21:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2684</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;@Stefan: Oh yeah, I&#039;ve had that installed for about 6-7 months now, but Firefox is still pretty chugly for me.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Stefan: Oh yeah, I&#8217;ve had that installed for about 6-7 months now, but Firefox is still pretty chugly for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stefan Wasilewski</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2683</link>
		<dc:creator>Stefan Wasilewski</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2683</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Install the flashblock firefox extension.  You&#039;ll find your cpu problems go away.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Install the flashblock firefox extension.  You&#8217;ll find your cpu problems go away.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Best</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2682</link>
		<dc:creator>John Best</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2682</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i use firefox, ie and opera.I love opera but it is harder to use.it is sad that opera will not identify itself as ie or mozilla anymore but still. I am awaiting, anybody got any screenshots.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i use firefox, ie and opera.I love opera but it is harder to use.it is sad that opera will not identify itself as ie or mozilla anymore but still. I am awaiting, anybody got any screenshots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Browsers (again) at D&#8217;Arcy Norman Dot Net</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2681</link>
		<dc:creator>Browsers (again) at D&#8217;Arcy Norman Dot Net</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 19:15:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2681</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] I&#8217;ve been playing with different browsers for the last couple of weeks (Safari, Flock, Firefox, Mozilla), and kept coming back to Safari because it just plain &#8220;feels&#8221; right. The other apps feel ported, in some parts poorly. Then, Les Orchard reminded me of OmniWeb. I&#8217;ve always loved OmniWeb, but the rendering engine was lacking in older versions, and the recent version switched to a custom WebKit framework which works quite well. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I&#8217;ve been playing with different browsers for the last couple of weeks (Safari, Flock, Firefox, Mozilla), and kept coming back to Safari because it just plain &#8220;feels&#8221; right. The other apps feel ported, in some parts poorly. Then, Les Orchard reminded me of OmniWeb. I&#8217;ve always loved OmniWeb, but the rendering engine was lacking in older versions, and the recent version switched to a custom WebKit framework which works quite well. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D'Arcy Norman</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2680</link>
		<dc:creator>D'Arcy Norman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 18:53:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2680</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Yeah - I keep waffling on default browsers. Tried FF for a while, but it was just too kludgey to use full time. Safari rocks, but I&#039;ve always had a soft spot for OmniWeb. LOVE the tearable textarea element... I&#039;ll be trying OW as my default for a few days. Who knows, maybe I&#039;ll stick with it this time :-)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah &#8211; I keep waffling on default browsers. Tried FF for a while, but it was just too kludgey to use full time. Safari rocks, but I&#8217;ve always had a soft spot for OmniWeb. LOVE the tearable textarea element&#8230; I&#8217;ll be trying OW as my default for a few days. Who knows, maybe I&#8217;ll stick with it this time :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/28/its-back-to-omniweb-for-me/comment-page-1#comment-2679</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 17:59:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=757#comment-2679</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Have you looked at &lt;a href=&quot;http://opera.com/&quot; title=&quot;Opera Web Browser&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Opera&lt;/a&gt; lately? I&#039;ve grown to really like it. Few quirks, but it&#039;s just muscle memory things at this point.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have you looked at <a href="http://opera.com/" title="Opera Web Browser" rel="nofollow">Opera</a> lately? I&#8217;ve grown to really like it. Few quirks, but it&#8217;s just muscle memory things at this point.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
