<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Reader: Big, blue, chunky water-wings</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings</link>
	<description>It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:01:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6-bleeding</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Google Reader &#124; scottyallen.com</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings#comment-55339</link>
		<dc:creator>Google Reader &#124; scottyallen.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Dec 2006 20:06:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=724#comment-55339</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] So, I&#8217;ve been playing with Google Reader a bit, and overall, it&#8217;s another slick Google AJAX app. However, I agree with Les over at OxDECAFBAD that it doesn&#8217;t really meet the needs of people who are used to reading lots and lots of feeds: Anyway, what I look for in a feed reader is how well it enables speed skimming: I&#8217;m going to ignore 70-90% of what I see in feeds, so I don&#8217;t want an aggregator which helps me carefully and methodically pick my way across the headlines.No, I want something which lets me scream through feeds as fast as my eyes can move and a finger can slap the space bar. I&#8217;ll queue up what I really want to read in browser tabs or some other temporary storage, but I’m not going to want to spend more than a split second on a headline. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] So, I&#8217;ve been playing with Google Reader a bit, and overall, it&#8217;s another slick Google AJAX app. However, I agree with Les over at OxDECAFBAD that it doesn&#8217;t really meet the needs of people who are used to reading lots and lots of feeds: Anyway, what I look for in a feed reader is how well it enables speed skimming: I&#8217;m going to ignore 70-90% of what I see in feeds, so I don&#8217;t want an aggregator which helps me carefully and methodically pick my way across the headlines.No, I want something which lets me scream through feeds as fast as my eyes can move and a finger can slap the space bar. I&#8217;ll queue up what I really want to read in browser tabs or some other temporary storage, but I’m not going to want to spend more than a split second on a headline. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Danny Ayers, Raw Blog : &#187; Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings#comment-2458</link>
		<dc:creator>Danny Ayers, Raw Blog : &#187; Google Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Oct 2005 08:58:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=724#comment-2458</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] As co-author of the world&#8217;s leading book on syndication* I guess I&#8217;m obliged to say a little more about Google&#8217;s Reader. Like certain other authors of leading books on syndication my first impressions were largely negative, but got significantly better. Les Orchard wins the prize for best put-down: Big, blue, chunky water-wings. His follow-up is sharp:   Thing is, Reader is so good at being what it is. I’m just critical because it’s good at being what I don’t want. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As co-author of the world&#8217;s leading book on syndication* I guess I&#8217;m obliged to say a little more about Google&#8217;s Reader. Like certain other authors of leading books on syndication my first impressions were largely negative, but got significantly better. Les Orchard wins the prize for best put-down: Big, blue, chunky water-wings. His follow-up is sharp:   Thing is, Reader is so good at being what it is. I’m just critical because it’s good at being what I don’t want. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wtf&#8230;? &#187; Google Reader</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings#comment-2239</link>
		<dc:creator>wtf&#8230;? &#187; Google Reader</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 14:30:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=724#comment-2239</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;[...] Google has released a web-based RSS reader and aggregator that is pretty nice. You can read all posts from all the feeds you subscribe to in a chronological order, or you can just read from a specific feed. It has lots of AJAX and a pretty smooth interface with shortcut keys that really speed up using it, although some people say it&#8217;s too slow. But I don&#8217;t read 1000 feeds. My issue with it is that it&#8217;s web-based, and while I&#8217;m employed building web software and I love the web as a universal platform, I still have to go to the website when I want to read my feeds, they&#8217;re not delivered to my desktop like in my email client. I&#8217;ll see how it goes. [...]&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Google has released a web-based RSS reader and aggregator that is pretty nice. You can read all posts from all the feeds you subscribe to in a chronological order, or you can just read from a specific feed. It has lots of AJAX and a pretty smooth interface with shortcut keys that really speed up using it, although some people say it&#8217;s too slow. But I don&#8217;t read 1000 feeds. My issue with it is that it&#8217;s web-based, and while I&#8217;m employed building web software and I love the web as a universal platform, I still have to go to the website when I want to read my feeds, they&#8217;re not delivered to my desktop like in my email client. I&#8217;ll see how it goes. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben Mason</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/10/07/google-reader-big-blue-chunky-water-wings#comment-2237</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben Mason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Oct 2005 22:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=724#comment-2237</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;the google new reader &lt;a href="http://flickr.com/photos/su1droot/50299167/" rel="nofollow"&gt;HATED&lt;/a&gt; my OPML from bloglines with is arounf 150 deep.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the google new reader <a href="http://flickr.com/photos/su1droot/50299167/" rel="nofollow">HATED</a> my OPML from bloglines with is arounf 150 deep.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
