Comments on: On attempted conversions via blog comment http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/09/27/on-attempted-conversions-via-blog-comment It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee. Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:24 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-hemorrhage hourly 1 By: Kevan Emmott http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/09/27/on-attempted-conversions-via-blog-comment#comment-2057 Kevan Emmott Wed, 28 Sep 2005 05:22:14 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=702#comment-2057 <p>Yeah, I think Keith's site was one of the first that had me so interested in some parts and so appalled at others. But there are certainly plenty out there. I guess I could just subscribe to a specific tag or category they have on their blog, but then you get this weird half truth...</p> <p>BTW, nice implementation of Wordpress - one of the better Kubrick-based ones I've seen (liking the AJAX commenting, for instance :-)).</p> Yeah, I think Keith's site was one of the first that had me so interested in some parts and so appalled at others. But there are certainly plenty out there. I guess I could just subscribe to a specific tag or category they have on their blog, but then you get this weird half truth...

BTW, nice implementation of Wordpress - one of the better Kubrick-based ones I've seen (liking the AJAX commenting, for instance :-)).

]]> By: Geof F. Morris http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/09/27/on-attempted-conversions-via-blog-comment#comment-2049 Geof F. Morris Tue, 27 Sep 2005 19:44:41 +0000 http://decafbad.com/blog/?p=702#comment-2049 <p>Exactly, Les. I mean, I look at all of us like circles on Venn diagrams: we overlap in spots, but not everywhere. I've yet to find the blogger with whom I agree 100% and wholeheartedly [if I found them, I'd just stop, y'know?].</p> <p>And frankly, I think it's good to read the opposing viewpoints, even if you get really angry and disagree. I hope that it's a situation where we can all admit that, at some level, they have a point. [Not everyone does, though.] I generally assume that folks are rational actors trying to muddle through with logic---we just have a varying set of basic assumptions from which we start, which may or may not be variable...</p> Exactly, Les. I mean, I look at all of us like circles on Venn diagrams: we overlap in spots, but not everywhere. I've yet to find the blogger with whom I agree 100% and wholeheartedly [if I found them, I'd just stop, y'know?].

And frankly, I think it's good to read the opposing viewpoints, even if you get really angry and disagree. I hope that it's a situation where we can all admit that, at some level, they have a point. [Not everyone does, though.] I generally assume that folks are rational actors trying to muddle through with logic---we just have a varying set of basic assumptions from which we start, which may or may not be variable...

]]>