Comments on: Atom Format Versioning After Last Call? http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/04/27/atom-format-versioning-after-last-call It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee. Thu, 20 Nov 2008 14:34:55 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7-beta3-9771 hourly 1 By: Sam Ruby http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/04/27/atom-format-versioning-after-last-call/comment-page-1#comment-1608 Sam Ruby Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=629#comment-1608 <p>You found the correct area of the spec. Also related: </p> <p>http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveVersionAttr http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/04/21/Atom-Format-Last-Call</p> You found the correct area of the spec. Also related:

http://www.intertwingly.net/wiki/pie/PaceRemoveVersionAttr
http://www.intertwingly.net/blog/2005/04/21/Atom-Format-Last-Call

]]> By: Randy Charles Morin http://decafbad.com/blog/2005/04/27/atom-format-versioning-after-last-call/comment-page-1#comment-1609 Randy Charles Morin Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000 http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=629#comment-1609 <p>I don't understand this version by namespace thingy. It would seem to me that versioning by namespace is gonna mean recoding every client for every version of the spec. Unfortunately, like yourself, I dropped out of the Atom noise list long ago.</p> I don’t understand this version by namespace thingy. It would seem to me that versioning by namespace is gonna mean recoding every client for every version of the spec. Unfortunately, like yourself, I dropped out of the Atom noise list long ago.

]]>