<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Hat Worms and robots.txt?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm</link>
	<description>It's all spinning wheels and self-doubt until the first pot of coffee.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 00:06:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0-alpha</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Edmondson</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1031</link>
		<dc:creator>David Edmondson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1031</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;How would a system tell the difference between white hat and black hat
worms or virii when they arrive?  Distributed trust network?&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How would a system tell the difference between white hat and black hat<br />
worms or virii when they arrive?  Distributed trust network?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1032</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1032</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Well, my incredibly naive idea is this:  White hats knock (ie. contact a known local service), and go away if told to.  Black hats sneak in the back door as usual.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, my incredibly naive idea is this:  White hats knock (ie. contact a known local service), and go away if told to.  Black hats sneak in the back door as usual.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSeitz</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1033</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSeitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1033</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;I think this is a bad line to cross. It&#039;s harder to argue against RIAA worms when you&#039;re supporting other &quot;good causes&quot; worms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately I don&#039;t have any great alternative ideas.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Get the OEMs to bundle ZoneAlarm lite? (Get ZoneAlarm to make a version that&#039;s tweaked to scare clueless users into paranoid fears?)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think this is a bad line to cross. It&#8217;s harder to argue against RIAA worms when you&#8217;re supporting other &#8220;good causes&#8221; worms.</p>
<p>Unfortunately I don&#8217;t have any great alternative ideas.</p>
<p>Get the OEMs to bundle ZoneAlarm lite? (Get ZoneAlarm to make a version that&#8217;s tweaked to scare clueless users into paranoid fears?)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: l.m.orchard</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1034</link>
		<dc:creator>l.m.orchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1034</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Hmm, maybe.  Though I&#039;d still say that, if worms sent out by the RIAA don&#039;t go away when told, they&#039;re rogue.  The only worms with white hats are the ones that stop other worms and virii.  Anything else is unwelcome, and subject to neutralization by other worms.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Hmm.  But yeah, lots of issues and it&#039;s a very naive idea&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm, maybe.  Though I&#8217;d still say that, if worms sent out by the RIAA don&#8217;t go away when told, they&#8217;re rogue.  The only worms with white hats are the ones that stop other worms and virii.  Anything else is unwelcome, and subject to neutralization by other worms.</p>
<p>Hmm.  But yeah, lots of issues and it&#8217;s a very naive idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunny</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1035</link>
		<dc:creator>sunny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1035</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;i actually thought your idea was awesome...just send out worms to fix security holes and they respect your no worms directive unless you specifically allow them in...
nice site i&#039;ll come back later.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i actually thought your idea was awesome&#8230;just send out worms to fix security holes and they respect your no worms directive unless you specifically allow them in&#8230;<br />
nice site i&#8217;ll come back later.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSeitz</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1036</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSeitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1036</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another thought: have a site that tests the holes in your computer when you ask it to. Then you need someone like EFF to promote it. But at least it&#039;s a 1-stop-shop.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another thought: have a site that tests the holes in your computer when you ask it to. Then you need someone like EFF to promote it. But at least it&#8217;s a 1-stop-shop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillSeitz</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1037</link>
		<dc:creator>BillSeitz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1037</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Another step back: aren&#039;t pretty much all the victims of these big worms users who click on email attachments?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(Sorry if that&#039;s a stupid question, I haven&#039;t been playing close attention to the technical coverage of the latest infections...)&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another step back: aren&#8217;t pretty much all the victims of these big worms users who click on email attachments?</p>
<p>(Sorry if that&#8217;s a stupid question, I haven&#8217;t been playing close attention to the technical coverage of the latest infections&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Burton</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1038</link>
		<dc:creator>John Burton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1038</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;What happens if I&#039;m running some private protocol on a port and this comes along and tried to send some other random data and breaks things? Not a good idea&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What happens if I&#8217;m running some private protocol on a port and this comes along and tried to send some other random data and breaks things? Not a good idea</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: 2lmc spool</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1039</link>
		<dc:creator>2lmc spool</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1039</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;2003/09/06 12:49&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href=&#039;http://www.decafbad.com/blog/tech/superworm.html&#039;&gt;White hat worms&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>2003/09/06 12:49</strong></p>
<p><a href='http://www.decafbad.com/blog/tech/superworm.html'>White hat worms</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grant Henninger</title>
		<link>http://decafbad.com/blog/2003/09/05/superworm/comment-page-1#comment-1040</link>
		<dc:creator>Grant Henninger</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.decafbad.com/blog/?p=477#comment-1040</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;White-hat worms to fix computer vulnerabilities&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Having white-hat worms fix computer vulnerabilities is one of the best ideas I have heard in a long time. If it is so easy for Blaster or any of the other worms that have been going around to get into...&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>White-hat worms to fix computer vulnerabilities</strong></p>
<p>Having white-hat worms fix computer vulnerabilities is one of the best ideas I have heard in a long time. If it is so easy for Blaster or any of the other worms that have been going around to get into&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
